↓ Skip to main content

ASCO

Long-Term Outcomes and Genetic Predictors of Response to Metastasis-Directed Therapy Versus Observation in Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer: Analysis of STOMP and ORIOLE Trials

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, October 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
203 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
Title
Long-Term Outcomes and Genetic Predictors of Response to Metastasis-Directed Therapy Versus Observation in Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer: Analysis of STOMP and ORIOLE Trials
Published in
Journal of Clinical Oncology, October 2022
DOI 10.1200/jco.22.00644
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew P. Deek, Kim Van der Eecken, Philip Sutera, Rebecca A. Deek, Valérie Fonteyne, Adrianna A. Mendes, Karel Decaestecker, Ana Ponce Kiess, Nicolaas Lumen, Ryan Phillips, Aurélie De Bruycker, Mark Mishra, Zaker Rana, Jason Molitoris, Bieke Lambert, Louke Delrue, Hailun Wang, Kathryn Lowe, Sofie Verbeke, Jo Van Dorpe, Renée Bultijnck, Geert Villeirs, Kathia De Man, Filip Ameye, Daniel Y. Song, Theodore DeWeese, Channing J. Paller, Felix Y. Feng, Alexander Wyatt, Kenneth J. Pienta, Maximillian Diehn, Soren M. Bentzen, Steven Joniau, Friedl Vanhaverbeke, Gert De Meerleer, Emmanuel S. Antonarakis, Tamara L. Lotan, Alejandro Berlin, Shankar Siva, Piet Ost, Phuoc T. Tran

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 203 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 69 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 25%
Other 6 9%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 6%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 24 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Engineering 3 4%
Unspecified 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 28 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 169. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2023.
All research outputs
#239,456
of 25,390,692 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#425
of 22,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,583
of 435,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#13
of 207 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,390,692 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,054 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,023 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 207 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.