| Title |
Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Identification of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: Results From the REDECT Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Clinical Oncology, December 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1200/jco.2011.41.2445 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chaitanya R. Divgi, Robert G. Uzzo, Constantine Gatsonis, Roman Bartz, Silke Treutner, Jian Qin Yu, David Chen, Jorge A. Carrasquillo, Steven Larson, Paul Bevan, Paul Russo |
| Abstract |
A clinical study to characterize renal masses with positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) was undertaken. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 54% |
| Spain | 2 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Brazil | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 2 | 15% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 54% |
| Scientists | 4 | 31% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Russia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 83 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 12% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 19% |
| Unknown | 20 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 45% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 9% |
| Chemistry | 7 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 23 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,441,751
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#3,547
of 22,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,859
of 286,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#29
of 213 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,047 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,162 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 213 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.